九游官网
今日摘要:保持更新频率,标题清晰、图片规范。

足协评议:成都蓉城胡荷韬进球被吹是误判,点球没判是错误(足协通报:成都蓉城胡荷韬进球被误吹,未判点球亦属错判)

提示:图片使用统一比例可减少 CLS。

forV

Summarizing a Chinese football evaluation

The user provided a Chinese headline about a CFA evaluation that a goal by Hu Hetao of Chengdu Rongcheng was disallowed due to misjudgment, and a penalty not awarded was an error. The user hasn't asked a specific question, so I'm thinking they might want a summary or context. This likely pertains to a Chinese Super League match, possibly against Qingdao Hainiu or Shandong Taishan. I could provide details about the match and Hu Hetao since there have been some controversies lately.Discussing CFA referee evaluations

![tion](/assets/images/1E533ACC.jpeg)

The user mentioned the CFA weekly referee evaluations, and they might want to discuss this without asking for anything specific. Since I don't have web access right now, it could be helpful to ask what the user wants—like a summary, the impact on standings, or an explanation of rules. I might share key takeaways about the missed decisions, such as a disallowed goal that should have counted and a missed penalty. I’ll also mention the possible implications for referees and the teams involved. If the user shares clips, I could analyze those too!Clarifying CFA evaluations

I’m thinking about providing questions to the user like whether they want the original statement, match details, or information on how appeals work. I could also explain that the CFA issues weekly reviews on incidents, using categories like "误判" for misjudgments and "漏判" for missed calls. The evaluation indicates that the disallowed goal was a misjudgment, and the penalty not awarded was an error.

I could create a concise bullet list summarizing the evaluation's impact on match results, repercussions, and implications for VAR. I might ask if they want a quick explainer of the incidents or keep it minimal.

![ion](/assets/images/C02205ED.jpg)

要点速览

  • 评议结论:胡荷韬进球被吹属“误判”;本方应获点球却未判属“漏判/错误判罚”。
  • ![要我解释这](/assets/images/5B3A534C.jpg)
  • 直接影响:裁判评议不改变比赛结果与积分;通常会影响当值裁判组的评级、轮换与培训。
  • 程序与后续:足协每轮对争议判例复盘,发布案例裁决;涉事俱乐部可获正式书面说明,必要时进行裁判通报与改进措施。
  • 规则层面:误判=错误地判罚已发生/未发生的犯规(如错判进球无效);漏判=应判未判(如漏判点球)。VAR应介入“进球、点球、直接红牌、身份错误”四类明显错漏。
  • 现实意义:承认错漏有助于提升透明度与执法一致性,但不触发改判或重赛;对后续比赛执法尺度与VAR介入门槛可能起到示范效应。

需要我:

  1. 解释这两次判罚在足球竞赛规则里的判定要点(越位/犯规/手球/点球判定标准)
  2. 汇总这场比赛的关键时间线与争议情节
  3. 对VAR介入是否到位做一份专业复盘建议
  4. 关注后续官方通报与可能的处罚结果